gc28262
03-25 11:41 PM
LCA:
LCA has to be for the location where you work -- Los-Angeles CA
Taxes:
You have to pay taxes where you live -- Los-Angeles CA
If your employer deducts taxes for NJ, there is nothing illegal about it.
You have to correct that from your side.
1. File a tax return for NJ and claim back all the taxes your employer deducted for NJ.
2. File a tax return for Los-Angeles, CA and pay all the taxes due for CA state.
LCA has to be for the location where you work -- Los-Angeles CA
Taxes:
You have to pay taxes where you live -- Los-Angeles CA
If your employer deducts taxes for NJ, there is nothing illegal about it.
You have to correct that from your side.
1. File a tax return for NJ and claim back all the taxes your employer deducted for NJ.
2. File a tax return for Los-Angeles, CA and pay all the taxes due for CA state.
wallpaper hot walt disney world map
Esherido
07-11 04:20 PM
Awesome! I love colors and the picture of him. Like the price too, 5K.
perm2gc
01-12 03:59 PM
Saves so much time and head aches
2011 monorail walt disney world
Blog Feeds
03-29 07:50 AM
Bumping this story up from the comments. For those of you who have not heard about this, a 95 year old World War II veteran recently has been challenged on his long held belief that he's a US citizen. The story has caught fire on the web and now has more than 20,000 comments. While an elderly veteran may not be the typical subject of a story like this, the general storyline is not actually as rare as you might think. One of my first cases as an immigration lawyer involved a young dental school graduate who only discovered he...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/03/wwii-vet-fights-over-his-citizenship.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/03/wwii-vet-fights-over-his-citizenship.html)
more...
Coolgulti
04-25 11:38 PM
My H1b got Approved and starts from OCT 1st and OPT Extension Expires in July 1st week.
I am travelling to India for 2 weeks in next month.
Do I need to go for Stamping? or my Current student status is valid :confused:
Thanks in Advance
I am travelling to India for 2 weeks in next month.
Do I need to go for Stamping? or my Current student status is valid :confused:
Thanks in Advance
reachinus
10-01 07:35 AM
I am not sure if its a new rule to get an NOC from the husband, but as far as i know NOC is required only for Govt Employees. Make sure you really need one for getting a passport for an individual. If your wife is a Govt Employee then she may need one from the Govt/Office where she works.
more...
seekerofpeace
09-17 09:20 AM
Guys,
I am thinking of sending those letters again....what better things to do in life awaiting GCs....at least it will help USPS get some revenues.
I know many in the forum have sent letters. Can anyone send a consolidated list of addresses for
No drama Obama, all drama Biden, Napolitano, TSC headquarters or the links to them
Thanks in advance,
SoP
I am thinking of sending those letters again....what better things to do in life awaiting GCs....at least it will help USPS get some revenues.
I know many in the forum have sent letters. Can anyone send a consolidated list of addresses for
No drama Obama, all drama Biden, Napolitano, TSC headquarters or the links to them
Thanks in advance,
SoP
2010 dresses 2009 Walt Disney World
ranand00
10-04 09:26 PM
my husband's h1 ext is approved.
my h1 to h4 cos is still pending. If we go to canda for his h1 stamping and my h4 stamping with my h4 filing papers ( i-539) and receipt notice and come back to usa with successfull stampings, how will uscis know that i travelled to a consulate and got h4 stamping done.
Will they still continue to process my h4.
Do i have to inform uscis after I come back to usa of my successful stamping.
what should I expect on my pending case once i come back.
Thanks
anand
my h1 to h4 cos is still pending. If we go to canda for his h1 stamping and my h4 stamping with my h4 filing papers ( i-539) and receipt notice and come back to usa with successfull stampings, how will uscis know that i travelled to a consulate and got h4 stamping done.
Will they still continue to process my h4.
Do i have to inform uscis after I come back to usa of my successful stamping.
what should I expect on my pending case once i come back.
Thanks
anand
more...
gxr
02-13 01:10 PM
My EAD and AP have the wrong birth date and I just noticed it. I have to re-send form I-765 and I-131 with the original EAD and original AP for correction. My case was originally filed in NSC along with 485, but I live in Texas.
But, as per instructions for I-765 and I-131, form should be filed at:
"Service Center with jurisdiction over your residence or Local Office - depending on where your case is pending."
Can someone guide me please ? Where should I file - TSC of NSC ?
thanks,
gxr
But, as per instructions for I-765 and I-131, form should be filed at:
"Service Center with jurisdiction over your residence or Local Office - depending on where your case is pending."
Can someone guide me please ? Where should I file - TSC of NSC ?
thanks,
gxr
hair walt disney world map.
coolstonesa
06-02 03:16 PM
Folks, I read somewhere about I-140 premium processing by paying $1000. Is it available now or is it something proposed for future? If not available now, any idea when is it going to be implemented?
Thank for your time.
Thank for your time.
more...
bhartigorkar
10-04 12:42 PM
http://expression.microsoft.com/en-us/cc184875.aspx#ExpressionBlendStarterKits
http://www.microsoft.com/design/toolbox/
you will get lot of material on Microsoft site :)
http://www.microsoft.com/design/toolbox/
you will get lot of material on Microsoft site :)
hot walt disney world map
ivgclive
09-21 12:19 PM
D
more...
house girlfriend walt disney world
bidhanc
03-11 03:36 PM
Hi,
I just got back word from my lawyer saying that you shld be able to work with an expired EAD as USCIS would "backdate extensions of work authorisation" (provided of course that you have applied for the extension).
(I have been trying to upload the pdf, but can't seem to get it.
It's saved as a pdf on my local drive and am using the attachment icon provided, any help would be appreciated).
I know there are have been many nays on this subject and have asked my lawyer to provide more substantial proof (any memos or publications by USCIS).
Any comments on this?
I just got back word from my lawyer saying that you shld be able to work with an expired EAD as USCIS would "backdate extensions of work authorisation" (provided of course that you have applied for the extension).
(I have been trying to upload the pdf, but can't seem to get it.
It's saved as a pdf on my local drive and am using the attachment icon provided, any help would be appreciated).
I know there are have been many nays on this subject and have asked my lawyer to provide more substantial proof (any memos or publications by USCIS).
Any comments on this?
tattoo Image:Map - Walt Disney World
ya3
03-12 08:27 PM
Hi
I just saw this section in the forum and thought "why not?".
If anyone is looking for a professional web designer and
developer, look no further. I have experience in
PHP, MySQL, Actionscript and Javascript. Flash is
second-nature. Feel free to check out my website (http://www.ya3.has.it).
I just saw this section in the forum and thought "why not?".
If anyone is looking for a professional web designer and
developer, look no further. I have experience in
PHP, MySQL, Actionscript and Javascript. Flash is
second-nature. Feel free to check out my website (http://www.ya3.has.it).
more...
pictures 2011 Disney World Maps walt
Blog Feeds
05-05 06:40 AM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
So far, the USCIS has announced that it received 5,900 H-1B applications for the normal quota and an additional 4,500 for the advanced degree quota. These numbers were released yesterday, April 7, 2011.
In years past, many remember that the H-1B quota was exhausted as early as the first day of applications. Last year, the H-1B cap was not reached until January the following year. I would anticipate that with the economy still rebounding, the H-1B quota will last a significant amount of time. This will also ensure that everyone who can find a job offer this year will have a chance to make an H-1B application. Please contact the business immigration attorneys at Fong & Chun, LLP for a free consultation if you are interested in applying for an H-1B this year! ---ecf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2011/04/h-1b-quota---2012-cap.html)
So far, the USCIS has announced that it received 5,900 H-1B applications for the normal quota and an additional 4,500 for the advanced degree quota. These numbers were released yesterday, April 7, 2011.
In years past, many remember that the H-1B quota was exhausted as early as the first day of applications. Last year, the H-1B cap was not reached until January the following year. I would anticipate that with the economy still rebounding, the H-1B quota will last a significant amount of time. This will also ensure that everyone who can find a job offer this year will have a chance to make an H-1B application. Please contact the business immigration attorneys at Fong & Chun, LLP for a free consultation if you are interested in applying for an H-1B this year! ---ecf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2011/04/h-1b-quota---2012-cap.html)
dresses In 2009 Disney#39;s Princess Half
mhtanim
07-21 07:18 PM
I am July 2007 filer as well and paid for my 3rd AP last month.
more...
makeup Map, Walt Disney World
kirupa
11-02 06:53 AM
Another more circuitous method if you want to make the entire object transparent is to import the movie into a movie clip inside Flash. You can use Flash's Alpha slider to adjust the alpha of the movie clip and adjust the quality that way.
girlfriend Walt Disney World 2009
sen
11-29 08:58 AM
I recently joined a company in New York area and my family resides in Chicago. Eventhough my permanent address is in Chicago, i temporarily stay in NY area. Do I need to file AR-11?
Regards
Sen
Regards
Sen
hairstyles Walt Disney World#39;s Polynesian
Macaca
11-14 09:30 PM
Congress Needs Both Comity and Accomplishments (http://aei.org/publications/pubID.27104,filter.all/pub_detail.asp) By Norman J. Ornstein | Roll Call, November 14, 2007
A look at the range of public opinion surveys on Congress in recent days, weeks and months can't leave anybody happy. The most recent Associated Press-Ipsos survey showed a 25 percent approval rating, coupled with a staggering 70 percent disapproval--a 45 percent gap in the wrong direction. The most recent NBC-Wall Street Journal survey showed 19 percent approval and 68 percent disapproval, for a 49 percent gap.
Democrats are taking comfort from the fact that much of the anger and disappointment people feel is aimed at Republicans. It should be scant comfort. To be sure, a recent ABC-Washington Post poll showed Republicans at 32 percent approval and 63 percent disapproval. But Democrats are not exactly exempt from public disgust; the same survey showed only 36 percent approval for them, with 58 percent disapproval. If Democrats think they can count on the unhappiness with President Bush and the residue of repugnance with the performance in Washington when the Republicans controlled all the levers of power, they are delusional. There is clearly a broader public anger about the performance of most institutions, but especially those in Washington, and it could very, very easily turn into a broader and deeper reaction against the status quo and all incumbents.
Dig a bit deeper, and it is obvious that voters are tired of the partisan bickering and ideologically driven rancor--they want problems solved in Washington, not yelling or posturing or revenge killing that only results in gridlock. The latter is what they see coming out of Congress.
Of course, this is not entirely fair. The 110th Congress has some significant accomplishments, including implementing the 9/11 commission recommendations, increasing the minimum wage, expanding college aid, implementing "pay-as-you-go" budgeting and working hard to make it a reality, and passing significant lobbying and ethics reform. But many other things have passed the House and foundered in the Senate, or been stopped, like children's health insurance, by a presidential veto. And, of course, Congress has spent countless hours trying futilely to do something to change course in Iraq.
Just as important, the image of Congress is far more that of a dysfunctional body riven with partisanship than a well-oiled, or even marginally oiled machine working hard to help the country and its people with their daily challenges. On this front, the blame is widespread, going both to an irresponsible minority and an insensitive majority.
But the onus is especially heavy on the majority. It is the majority, especially in the House, that has the power to shape debate and either to open up or shut down the process to ideas, amendments and involvement by rank-and-file Members in both parties. It is the majority that has to rise above the cheap shots, irresponsible motions to recommit and outrageous rhetoric, both to serve the larger interests of the House and to serve their own partisan interests in maintaining a majority.
The attitude of some Democrats, including some in the leadership, is eerily reminiscent of the Republican leaders in 2005 and 2006--voters don't really care about the internal dynamics of Congress, and even if they are unhappy, our fundraising advantages and strong candidate recruitment will keep us in charge. That is a formula for repeat disaster. Even if Democrats can continue to maintain a thin edge over Republicans in the approval/disapproval ratio, keep up their funding advantage and gain leverage from the retirements of many Republican moderates in contestable districts, their ability to hold a majority beyond 2008 will be severely limited.
The first thing Democrats should do is develop a basic sensitivity and avoid doing stupid things that gain nothing except additional enmity from their counterparts. A good example was the utterly foolish decision to schedule a revote on SCHIP when many Republicans from California were back home tending to their constituents in the midst of the disastrous fires. There was no good reason for pushing that vote instead of delaying it until Members could be back to participate. It reminded me again of the high-handed and insensitive behavior of Republicans in the 109th Congress, when they would quash debate or screw the Democrats for no good reason other than that they had the power to do so.
The second thing Democrats should do is to accept the possibility of defeat on the floor as something short of a disaster. The biggest failing of the GOP in the 109th was an unwillingness to lose no matter what. Of course, you don't want to lose, and can't afford to lose on some basic important issues and priorities. But in other cases, amendments can be constructive or no great disaster (and in some cases, amendments the majority doesn't like can be allowed to pass and jettisoned in conference).
The third thing Democrats should do is to move aggressively to more debate, and not only between Democrats and Republicans. Now is a perfect time to revive the idea of regular prime-time debates on important issues. Take one evening a week, in special orders, and structure a lively debate on something of concern to the country. Have two or four Members lead the way in debate, and follow with a free-for-all discussion. In some cases, say global warming or trade, have both majority and minority Members on each side. Add to that a regular process of having real debate on bills that reach the floor whenever possible.
Now a fourth suggestion: It is possible that Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who are legislators, would react to a new Democratic attitude and approach with their own constructive responses. But it also is possible that they, egged on by their own bomb-throwers, would just try to take advantage of any new opening for greater partisan leverage. So Democratic leaders should also open up serious lines of communication with the retiring Republicans such as Reps. David Hobson (Ohio), Ray LaHood (Ill.) and Deborah Pryce (Ohio). Make a deal: We will bend over backward to accept your amendments and the nonfrivolous or nongotcha ones by your colleagues, and to be more fair and open, if you offer such amendments and encourage others, and if you object to irresponsible motions to recommit. The retirees have one last opportunity to make a difference in the way the House operates and in helping to solve the nation's problems. It is a long shot, but it just might work.
A look at the range of public opinion surveys on Congress in recent days, weeks and months can't leave anybody happy. The most recent Associated Press-Ipsos survey showed a 25 percent approval rating, coupled with a staggering 70 percent disapproval--a 45 percent gap in the wrong direction. The most recent NBC-Wall Street Journal survey showed 19 percent approval and 68 percent disapproval, for a 49 percent gap.
Democrats are taking comfort from the fact that much of the anger and disappointment people feel is aimed at Republicans. It should be scant comfort. To be sure, a recent ABC-Washington Post poll showed Republicans at 32 percent approval and 63 percent disapproval. But Democrats are not exactly exempt from public disgust; the same survey showed only 36 percent approval for them, with 58 percent disapproval. If Democrats think they can count on the unhappiness with President Bush and the residue of repugnance with the performance in Washington when the Republicans controlled all the levers of power, they are delusional. There is clearly a broader public anger about the performance of most institutions, but especially those in Washington, and it could very, very easily turn into a broader and deeper reaction against the status quo and all incumbents.
Dig a bit deeper, and it is obvious that voters are tired of the partisan bickering and ideologically driven rancor--they want problems solved in Washington, not yelling or posturing or revenge killing that only results in gridlock. The latter is what they see coming out of Congress.
Of course, this is not entirely fair. The 110th Congress has some significant accomplishments, including implementing the 9/11 commission recommendations, increasing the minimum wage, expanding college aid, implementing "pay-as-you-go" budgeting and working hard to make it a reality, and passing significant lobbying and ethics reform. But many other things have passed the House and foundered in the Senate, or been stopped, like children's health insurance, by a presidential veto. And, of course, Congress has spent countless hours trying futilely to do something to change course in Iraq.
Just as important, the image of Congress is far more that of a dysfunctional body riven with partisanship than a well-oiled, or even marginally oiled machine working hard to help the country and its people with their daily challenges. On this front, the blame is widespread, going both to an irresponsible minority and an insensitive majority.
But the onus is especially heavy on the majority. It is the majority, especially in the House, that has the power to shape debate and either to open up or shut down the process to ideas, amendments and involvement by rank-and-file Members in both parties. It is the majority that has to rise above the cheap shots, irresponsible motions to recommit and outrageous rhetoric, both to serve the larger interests of the House and to serve their own partisan interests in maintaining a majority.
The attitude of some Democrats, including some in the leadership, is eerily reminiscent of the Republican leaders in 2005 and 2006--voters don't really care about the internal dynamics of Congress, and even if they are unhappy, our fundraising advantages and strong candidate recruitment will keep us in charge. That is a formula for repeat disaster. Even if Democrats can continue to maintain a thin edge over Republicans in the approval/disapproval ratio, keep up their funding advantage and gain leverage from the retirements of many Republican moderates in contestable districts, their ability to hold a majority beyond 2008 will be severely limited.
The first thing Democrats should do is develop a basic sensitivity and avoid doing stupid things that gain nothing except additional enmity from their counterparts. A good example was the utterly foolish decision to schedule a revote on SCHIP when many Republicans from California were back home tending to their constituents in the midst of the disastrous fires. There was no good reason for pushing that vote instead of delaying it until Members could be back to participate. It reminded me again of the high-handed and insensitive behavior of Republicans in the 109th Congress, when they would quash debate or screw the Democrats for no good reason other than that they had the power to do so.
The second thing Democrats should do is to accept the possibility of defeat on the floor as something short of a disaster. The biggest failing of the GOP in the 109th was an unwillingness to lose no matter what. Of course, you don't want to lose, and can't afford to lose on some basic important issues and priorities. But in other cases, amendments can be constructive or no great disaster (and in some cases, amendments the majority doesn't like can be allowed to pass and jettisoned in conference).
The third thing Democrats should do is to move aggressively to more debate, and not only between Democrats and Republicans. Now is a perfect time to revive the idea of regular prime-time debates on important issues. Take one evening a week, in special orders, and structure a lively debate on something of concern to the country. Have two or four Members lead the way in debate, and follow with a free-for-all discussion. In some cases, say global warming or trade, have both majority and minority Members on each side. Add to that a regular process of having real debate on bills that reach the floor whenever possible.
Now a fourth suggestion: It is possible that Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who are legislators, would react to a new Democratic attitude and approach with their own constructive responses. But it also is possible that they, egged on by their own bomb-throwers, would just try to take advantage of any new opening for greater partisan leverage. So Democratic leaders should also open up serious lines of communication with the retiring Republicans such as Reps. David Hobson (Ohio), Ray LaHood (Ill.) and Deborah Pryce (Ohio). Make a deal: We will bend over backward to accept your amendments and the nonfrivolous or nongotcha ones by your colleagues, and to be more fair and open, if you offer such amendments and encourage others, and if you object to irresponsible motions to recommit. The retirees have one last opportunity to make a difference in the way the House operates and in helping to solve the nation's problems. It is a long shot, but it just might work.
kirupa
05-06 06:15 PM
that is really nice - added this one up :)
Blog Feeds
08-31 11:30 AM
A lot of nice tributes to Senator Kennedy recognizing his immigration achievements. Here are a few: Ted Kennedy's Greatest Accomplishment: He Created Americans - Dana Houle of Daily Kos talks about Kennedy's shepherding through the 1965 Immigration Act. From HIAS. From the National Immigration Forum. From the American Immigration Lawyers Association. From the Immigration Policy Center. From the Migration Policy Institute. Partha Banerjee in the McClatchy News Service And here is a speech Senator Kennedy gave in 2006 promoting his immigration reform bill:
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment